Boko Haram; then and now – Vanguard
By Donu Kogbara
I HAVE been feeling so depressed about the situation in Nigeria. As a onetime victim of kidnappers (who abducted me in Port Harcourt in 2015), I am particularly concerned about the chronic insecurity.
Like so many other inhabitants of this besieged nation, I am hyper-vigilant and frightened of doing normal things like driving to funerals that take place outside big cities, lest I be attacked by outlaws on and in inadequately-policed highways and hamlets.
READ ALSO:Bill seeking direct payment of 13% derivation to host communities, introduced in House of Reps
Even in the capital city, which is full of law enforcement personnel, it is hard to feel relaxed and safe because even in Abuja, criminals are having a field day and lots of people fear nocturnal socialising.
While gloomily dwelling on the status quo today – frequent kidnappings of innocent schoolchildren being especially distressing – I recalled an article I wrote about Boko Haram for a foreign newspaper in February 2013. I’ve decided to share it with you.
Sadly, things have gotten worse since then…
Until Boko Haram staged Nigeria’s first-ever suicide bombing in 2010, most of their compatriots (this writer included) complacently assumed that home-grown Islamic militants could be controlled and were, though undoubtedly dangerous, pretty tame compared to their counterparts elsewhere. How wrong we were.
This shadowy, brutal and fearless jihadist group, which kidnapped seven French citizens in Northern Cameroon last week and has killed thousands of innocents on its native soil, has made a mockery of the once-widespread conviction that no Nigerian on the planet was religious, brave or selfless enough to sacrifice his or her life for a cause.
Even when Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a young Nigerian Al Qaida devotee, was caught trying to detonate a bomb on a US-bound flight in 2009, almost every Nigerian I spoke to at the time suspected that he got cold feet and deliberately sabotaged the mission he had been sent on.
The “evidence” that inspired this suspicion was the fact that, having boarded the plane in Amsterdam, he sat on it for several hours, only started to fiddle around with the bomb he had concealed in his underwear when Detroit airport was in sight, and then handled the detonation exercise so ineptly that another passenger was able to subdue him fairly easily.
Abuja, Nigeria’s capital city, is in the North-Central part of the country. I lived there for 12 years until October 2011; and I personally witnessed Boko Haram dispelling the above myth, becoming a terrifying force to be reckoned with and seriously undermining the public’s confidence in President Goodluck Jonathan.
Boko Haram has notched up some spectacular successes. It has blown up the United Nations building in Abuja. It has gained entry to Abuja’s police headquarters; and its outrages have had an enormous psychological impact on the nation, with many believing it invincible. At one point the Hilton Hotel was almost deserted because of fears it would be targeted. Meanwhile, foreign airline crews stopped sleeping over in Abuja and several children were sent to school abroad by frightened parents.
Boko Haram has now stepped up its campaign, with an aggressive and high-profile incursion into foreign territory. On Tuesday the group released a video of the hostages in which the kidnapping was described as retribution for France’s military intervention in Mali.
The borders that separate Nigeria from its neighbours have always been porous. But, until last week’s audacious Cameroonian abduction, the insurgents had restricted their terror campaign to Northern Nigeria.
The churches they attacked were always in the North. They didn’t venture to the South, where most Nigerian Christians live. But the fear is they may now start to do so.
If they are now crossing borders to hunt for expatriate hostages whose capture guarantees them maximum publicity on an international level, might they not also soon make an attempt to similarly expand their activities into Southern Nigeria?
Ironically, Boko Haram has hitherto murdered more fellow Muslims – spiritual leaders included – than “infidels”. But some observers are expecting this to change.
The Nigerian government participated in the assault on Malian Muslim rebels in a bid to halt the spread of fundamentalism in West Africa – and in so doing, deprive Boko Haram of one of its recruiting and training grounds and arms supply routes. But it is difficult to predict whether the desired results can be achieved and sustained.
Meanwhile, Muslim Nigerians from the North are as concerned about the Boko Haram threat as Nigerians from the South.
According to Hassan Mohammed, a judge from the North-East: “It is laughable to describe these characters as pro-North or as defenders of Islam.
They are evil anarchists who have not only killed almost every imam in the Maiduguri area but are hellbent on eliminating our political and traditional rulers as well.” And he adds:
“The Northern elite is often accused of being in cahoots with Boko Haram… but nothing could be further from the truth. Why would we stupidly support terrorists who treat us like hated opponents and are always trying to kill us?”
Some believe Boko Haram is partly about hungry, angry, unemployed Northern boys saying “enough is enough” in a country that is lamentably corrupt, with the privileged callously ignoring the poor.
But Nigeria, sadly, is not going to become an oasis of enlightenment anytime soon; and if a relatively sophisticated country like Britain took decades to neutralise the Irish Republican Army (IRA), it may take Nigeria at least as long to bring the homicidal and suicidal guerrilla fighters of Boko Haram to heel.
Boko Haram is a strange, amorphous, hydra-headed beast that is feeding off Nigeria’s many problems and grievances and has just demonstrated that it is willing and able to spread its terror campaign to new regions. Many people are pessimistic about it being vanquished in the forseeable future.